Computer platforms designed for improved electronic execution of electronic transactions and methods of use thereof

ABSTRACT

In order to facilitate secure and confidential electronic exchanges, systems and methods include establishing an electronic communication session based on participation levels controlled by a stack software object such that each invitee computing device associated with each invitee is prevented from accessing activities in the electronic communication session unless the invitee satisfies first predetermined parameters based on a locked stack participation level; an initiating computing device associated with the initiating user is enabled to access the electronic communication setting at a reserve level while each invitee computing device is prevented from accessing the activities in the electronic communication session unless the invitee satisfies second predetermined parameters based on an unlocked stack participation level; and the initiating computing device and each invitee computing device are enabled to access the activities in the electronic communication session based on an open stack participation level.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No.16/805,401 filed Feb. 28, 2020, now abandoned which claims priority toU.S. Provisional patent application Ser. No. 62/812,602 filed on Mar. 1,2019, incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.

STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT

Not Applicable.

TECHNICAL FIELD

In some embodiments, the present disclosure is related tocomputer-implemented methods and computer systems for an electronictransaction platform.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Communications can be performed over networks between client devices.The communications are defined by protocols enabling the exchange ofpackets of information. In network communications amongst groups, thesepackets of information may be viewable by all parties. However,typically, all information is available to all parties, all parties aretypically allowed the same level of participation. Networking andnetwork communications technologies provide insufficient control ofinformation access.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In some embodiments, the present disclosure provides an exemplarytechnically improved computer-based method that includes at least thefollowing steps of receiving, by at least one processor, a sessionrequest from an initiating user, where the session request includes anelectronic communication session over a cloud computing network for atransfer of a quantity of a position in at least one financialinstrument from the initiating user to at least one session invitee;generating, by the at least one processor, a list of potentialintermediate entities based at least in part on a respective dealerliquidity score associated with each potential intermediate entity ofthe potential intermediate entities; receiving, by the at least oneprocessor, a selection from the initiating user identifying a selectedintermediate entity of the potential intermediate entities to mediatethe electronic communication session; enabling, by the at least oneprocessor, the initiating user and the selected intermediate entity tonegotiate attributes of the electronic communication session;generating, by the at least one processor, based on the attributes ofthe electronic communication session, a stack software objectcontrolling a plurality of participation levels in the electroniccommunication session for each selected invitee of a set of selectedinvitees, where the plurality of participation levels includes: i) alocked stack participation level, ii) an unlocked stack participationlevel, and iii) an open stack participation level; receiving, by the atleast one processor, an invitee selection from the selected intermediateentity indicating the set of selected invitees selected from a pluralityof potential invitees; establishing, by the at least one processor, theelectronic communication session, associated with an intermediarycomputing device of the selected intermediate entity, where theelectronic communication session includes the stack software object;preventing, by the at least one processor, a respective inviteecomputing device associated with each respective selected invitee fromaccessing activities in the electronic communication session unless therespective selected invitee satisfies at least one first predeterminedparameter based on the locked stack participation level of the stacksoftware object; enabling, by the at least one processor, an initiatingcomputing device associated with the initiating user to access in theelectronic communication setting at a reserve level while preventingeach respective invitee computing device associated with each respectiveselected invitee from accessing the activities in the electroniccommunication session unless the respective selected invitee satisfiesat least one second predetermined parameter based on the unlocked stackparticipation level of the stack software object; and enabling, by theat least one processor, the initiating computing device associated withthe initiating user and each respective invitee computing deviceassociated with each respective selected invitee to access theactivities in the electronic communication session based on the openstack participation level of the stack software object.

In some embodiments, the present disclosure provides another exemplarytechnically improved computer-based system that includes at least thefollowing components of at least one processor. The at least oneprocessor is configured to: receive a session request from an initiatinguser, where the session request includes an electronic communicationsession over a cloud computing network for a transfer of a quantity of aposition in at least one financial instrument from the initiating userto at least one session invitee; generate a list of potentialintermediate entities based at least in part on a respective dealerliquidity score associated with each potential intermediate entity ofthe potential intermediate entities; receive a selection from theinitiating user identifying a selected intermediate entity of thepotential intermediate entities to mediate the electronic communicationsession; enable the initiating user and the selected intermediate entityto negotiate attributes of the electronic communication session;generate based on the attributes of the electronic communicationsession, a stack software object controlling a plurality ofparticipation levels in the electronic communication session for eachselected invitee of a set of selected invitees; where the plurality ofparticipation levels includes: i) a locked stack participation level,ii) an unlocked stack participation level, and iii) an open stackparticipation level; receive an invitee selection from the selectedintermediate entity indicating the set of selected invitees selectedfrom a plurality of potential invitees; establish the electroniccommunication session, associated with an intermediary computing deviceof the selected intermediate entity, where the electronic communicationsession includes the stack software object; prevent a respective inviteecomputing device associated with each respective selected invitee fromaccessing activities in the electronic communication session unless therespective selected invitee satisfies at least one first predeterminedparameter based on the locked stack participation level of the stacksoftware object; enable an initiating computing device associated withthe initiating user to access in the electronic communication setting ata reserve level while preventing each respective invitee computingdevice associated with each respective selected invitee from accessingthe activities in the electronic communication session unless therespective selected invitee satisfies at least one second predeterminedparameter based on the unlocked stack participation level of the stacksoftware object; and enable the initiating computing device associatedwith the initiating user and each respective invitee computing deviceassociated with each respective selected invitee to access theactivities in the electronic communication session based on the openstack participation level of the stack software object.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS

The patent or application file contains at least one drawing executed incolor. Copies of this patent or patent application publication withcolor drawing(s) will be provided by the Office upon request and paymentof the necessary fee.

Various embodiments of the present disclosure can be further explainedwith reference to the attached drawings, wherein like structures arereferred to by like numerals throughout the several views. The drawingsshown are not necessarily to scale, with emphasis instead generallybeing placed upon illustrating the principles of the present disclosure.Therefore, specific structural and functional details disclosed hereinare not to be interpreted as limiting, but merely as a representativebasis for teaching one skilled in the art to variously employ one ormore illustrative embodiments.

FIGS. 1A-19 show one or more schematic flow diagrams, certaincomputer-based architectures, and/or screenshots of various specializedgraphical user interfaces which are illustrative of some exemplaryaspects of at least some embodiments of the present disclosure.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Embodiments of the present disclosure, briefly summarized above anddiscussed in greater detail below, can be understood by reference to theillustrative embodiments of the present disclosure depicted in theappended drawings. It is to be noted, however, that the appendeddrawings illustrate only typical embodiments of this present disclosureand are therefore not to be considered limiting of its scope, for thepresent disclosure may admit to other equally effective embodiments.

It is understood that at least one aspect/functionality of variousembodiments described herein can be performed in real-time and/ordynamically. As used herein, the term “real-time” is directed to anevent/action that can occur instantaneously or almost instantaneously intime when another event/action has occurred. For example, the “real-timeprocessing,” “real-time computation,” and “real-time execution” allpertain to the performance of a computation during the actual time thatthe related physical process (e.g., a user interacting with anapplication on a mobile device) occurs, in order that results of thecomputation can be used in guiding the physical process. For example, insome embodiments, an event occurs in real-time if a time differencebetween a first time when an exemplary order is received and a secondtime when a dealer makes the exemplary offer for counterbidding is nomore than 10 minutes. For example, in some embodiments, an event occursin real-time if a time difference between a first time when an exemplaryorder is received and a second time when a dealer makes the exemplaryoffer for counterbidding is no more than 1 second. For example, in someembodiments, an event occurs in real-time if a time difference between afirst time when an exemplary order is received and a second time when adealer makes the exemplary offer for counterbidding is between less than1 second and 10 minutes.

As used herein, the term “dynamically” means that events and/or actionscan be triggered and/or occur without any human intervention. In someembodiments, events and/or actions in accordance with the presentdisclosure can be in real-time and/or based on a predeterminedperiodicity of at least one of: nanosecond, several nanoseconds,millisecond, several milliseconds, second, several seconds, minute,several minutes, hourly, several hours, daily, several days, weekly,monthly, etc. As used herein, the terms “dynamically” and automaticallyare used interchangeably and have the same meaning.

As used herein, the term “runtime” corresponds to any behaviour that isdynamically determined during an execution of a software application orat least a portion of software application.

In some embodiments, the inventive specially programmed computingsystems with associated devices are configured to operate in thedistributed network environment, communicating over a suitable datacommunication network (e.g., the Internet, etc.) and utilizing at leastone suitable data communication protocol (e.g., IPX/SPX, X.25, AX.25,AppleTalk™, TCP/IP (e.g., HTTP), etc.). Of note, the embodimentsdescribed herein may, of course, be implemented using any appropriatehardware and/or computing software languages. In this regard, those ofordinary skill in the art are well versed in the type of computerhardware that may be used, the type of computer programming techniquesthat may be used (e.g., object-oriented programming), and the type ofcomputer programming languages that may be used (e.g., C++, Objective-C,Swift, Java, JavaScript). The aforementioned examples are, of course,illustrative and not restrictive.

The material disclosed herein may be implemented in software or firmwareor a combination of them or as instructions stored on a machine-readablemedium, which may be read and executed by one or more processors. Amachine-readable medium may include any medium and/or mechanism forstoring or transmitting information in a form readable by a machine(e.g., a computing device). For example, a machine-readable medium mayinclude read only memory (ROM); random access memory (RAM); magneticdisk storage media; optical storage media; flash memory devices;electrical, optical, acoustical or other forms of propagated signals(e.g., carrier waves, infrared signals, digital signals, etc.), andothers.

In another form, a non-transitory article, such as a non-transitorycomputer readable medium, may be used with any of the examples mentionedabove or other examples except that it does not include a transitorysignal per se. It does include those elements other than a signal per sethat may hold data temporarily in a “transitory” fashion such as RAM andso forth.

As used herein, the terms “computer engine” and “engine” identify atleast one software component and/or a combination of at least onesoftware component and at least one hardware component which aredesigned/programmed/configured to manage/control other software and/orhardware components (such as the libraries, software development kits(SDKs), objects, etc.).

Examples of hardware elements may include processors, microprocessors,circuits, circuit elements (e.g., transistors, resistors, capacitors,inductors, and so forth), integrated circuits, application specificintegrated circuits (ASIC), programmable logic devices (PLD), digitalsignal processors (DSP), field programmable gate array (FPGA), logicgates, registers, semiconductor device, chips, microchips, chip sets,and so forth. In some embodiments, the one or more processors may beimplemented as a Complex Instruction Set Computer (CISC) or ReducedInstruction Set Computer (RISC) processors; x86 instruction setcompatible processors, multi-core, or any other microprocessor orcentral processing unit (CPU). In various implementations, the one ormore processors may be dual-core processor(s), dual-core mobileprocessor(s), and so forth.

Examples of software may include software components, programs,applications, computer programs, application programs, system programs,machine programs, operating system software, middleware, firmware,software modules, routines, subroutines, functions, methods, procedures,software interfaces, application program interfaces (API), instructionsets, computing code, computer code, code segments, computer codesegments, words, values, symbols, or any combination thereof.Determining whether an embodiment is implemented using hardware elementsand/or software elements may vary in accordance with any number offactors, such as desired computational rate, power levels, heattolerances, processing cycle budgets, input data rates, output datarates, memory resources, data bus speeds and other design or performanceconstraints.

One or more aspects of at least one embodiment may be implemented byrepresentative instructions stored on a machine-readable medium whichrepresents various logic within the processor, which when read by amachine causes the machine to fabricate logic to perform the techniquesdescribed herein. Such representations, known as “IP cores” may bestored on a tangible, machine readable medium and supplied to variouscustomers or manufacturing facilities to load into the fabricationmachines that make the logic or processor.

As used herein, the term “user” shall have a meaning of at least oneuser.

As used herein, the term “backstop” identifies a bid or offer (anelectronic firm trading submission), depending on the direction of anexemplary inventive electronic communication session detailed that maybe provided by the electronic communication dealer at the start of theelectronic communication session, prior to invitees being able to placea bid/offer. For example, the price and/or size provided by theelectronic communication dealer is firm and will result in a trade atthe conclusion of the electronic communication, unless the electroniccommunication dealer's bid/offer is not allocated in the electroniccommunication due to more competitive bids/offers.

As used herein, the term “buyside” identifies market participants insecurities which generally refer to investment firms that purchasesecurities, such as asset managers. For example, buyside marketparticipants may include, but are not limited to, mutual funds, pensionfunds, family offices, hedge funds, and private equity funds.

As used herein, the term “committed level” identifies a firm price levelset by the initiating user that the initiating user will trade (i.e. buyor sell depending on the side) the specific financial instrument (e.g.,corporate bond).

As used herein, the term “dealer” identifies a market participant thatacts as an intermediary in the securities markets by buying and/orselling securities on its own account before selling the securities to acustomer and provides the sellers, buyers or both, access to thesettlement system for the trades that are executed. In some embodiments,these are characterized as “riskless principal” trades.

As used herein, the term “intermediate entity” identifies a singledealer associated with the particular electronic communication sessionwho accepted an invitation from the initiating user and/or fromexemplary inventive electronic execution-mediating platform of thepresent disclosure to act as the dealer to host an electroniccommunication session. In some embodiments, the dealer may runelectronic communication sessions where the dealer is both theinitiating user and electronic communication dealer

As used herein, the term “initiating user” identifies a user thatdesires to initiate an electronic inventive electronic communicationsession and who will either purchase or sell corporate bonds at theconclusion of the electronic communication session if the initiatinguser's pre-determined parameters are met. For example, an exemplaryinitiating user may be a member of the membership network of users thatthe exemplary inventive electronic execution-mediating platform of thepresent disclosure is configured to operate.

As used herein, the term “dealer” identifies a market participant thatacts as an intermediary in the securities markets by buying and/orselling securities on its own account before selling the securities to acustomer.

As used herein, the term “intermediate user” identifies a single dealerassociate with the particular electronic communication session whoaccepted an invitation from the initiating user and/or from theexemplary inventive electronic execution-mediating platform of thepresent disclosure to act as the dealer to host an electroniccommunication session.

As used herein, the term “invitee” identifies a party that is invited toact as a invitee to an electronic inventive electronic communicationsession (opportunity to bid or offer, depending on the direction of theelectronic communication session, on the corporate bond that is thesubject of the electronic communication session) based at least in parton i) selection by the electronic communication dealer; ii) expressedPre-Trade intention; and/or iii) determination by the exemplaryinventive electronic execution-mediating platform of the presentdisclosure based at least in part on data of the liquidity database.

As used herein, the term “pre-trade intention” identifies an expressionof interest (electronically set preference and/or electronic submission)by a user in buying and/or selling a particular financial instrument(e.g., corporate bond) at a given price for a given size.

As used herein, the terms “liquidity monitor” and “liquidity dashboard”interchangeably identify one or more specialized inventive graphicaluser interfaces (GUIs) that display a liquidity score for each financialinstrument (e.g., each corporate bond).

As used herein, the term “electronic communication dealer's liquidityscore” identifies a calculated score assigned to each electroniccommunication dealer for each financial instrument (e.g., each corporatebond) and/or a calculate score based on data including, but not limitedto, historical trading data of similar corporate bonds by eachrespective dealer, as determined by the exemplary inventive electronicexecution-mediating platform of the present disclosure.

As used herein, the terms “financial instrument's liquidity score” or“corporate bond's liquidity score” identifies a calculated scoreassigned to each financial instrument (e.g., each corporate bond) basedon data including, but not limited to, historical trading data of theparticular corporate bond and/or similar corporate bond(s), asdetermined by the exemplary inventive electronic execution-mediatingplatform of the present disclosure.

As used herein, the terms “liquidity cloud” identifies a combination ofspecifically one or more programmed software/hardware modules incommunication with one or more electronic distribute and/or centralizeddatabases that may be programmed with suitable analytical logic detailedherein, and continuously updated with users' (e.g., members/users of theexemplary inventive electronic execution-mediating platform of thepresent disclosure) list of financial instruments (e.g., corporatebonds) that they have a specific interest in bidding/offering on (i.e.pre-trade intentions) in the event that another market participantinitiates an electronic communication session. For example,members/users of the exemplary inventive electronic execution-mediatingplatform of the present disclosure are able to upload existing corporatebond positions that they want the exemplary inventive electronicexecution-mediating platform of the present disclosure to provideanalytics on to the liquidity cloud directly or from their OrderManagement System. For example, in some embodiments, once the corporatebond positions are added to the liquidity cloud, the liquidity cloud'sanalytics module may generate and present to a particular user aliquidity score, based on a number of factors, including but not limitedto other market participants' pre-trade intentions uploaded to theliquidity cloud, that estimate the likelihood that there is contrainterest in the individual corporate bond. For example, the user may bealso provided with a liquidity score for each corporate bond positionbased on data including, but not limited to, TRACE data and user'shistorical data to determine how much liquidity there is in the marketfor that corporate bond. For example, in addition to uploading existingpositions which they are interested in selling, clients can uploadcorporate bond positions that they would be interested in purchasing ifthey became available. In some embodiments, the availability of variousliquidity scores allows the exemplary inventive electronicexecution-mediating platform of the present disclosure to increase thespeed of trade execution due to users' ability to make their decisionsquicker (e.g., in real-time).

As used herein, the term “invitees” identifies invitees that haveprovided a bid or offer, depending on the direction of the particularelectronic communication session.

As used herein, the term “stack GUI(s)” identifies one or morespecialized inventive GUIs that is/are configured to display the priceand size that invitees have submitted for the financial instrument(e.g., a corporate bond) that is the subject of a particular inventiveelectronic communication session.

As used herein, the term “TRACE” identifies the Trade Reporting andCompliance Engine hosted by FINRA which provides a historicalperspective of the trade in over-the-counter markets for U.S. corporatebonds, agency debentures, asset-backed and mortgage backed securitymarkets.

As used herein, the term “post-trade” identifies a state at theconclusion of a particular electronic communication session when theexemplary inventive electronic execution-mediating platform of thepresent disclosure is configured to generate electronic notifications toall invitees that received an allocation in the electronic communicationsession.

In some embodiments, the exemplary inventive electronicexecution-mediating platform of the present disclosure is configured toallow initiating users to decide on which dealer to request to be theelectronic communication dealer based at least in part on whichdealer(s) each respective initiating user has an existing tradingrelationship and/or the dealers' liquidity scores. In some embodiments,the exemplary inventive electronic execution-mediating platform of thepresent disclosure is configured to require the initiating user toselect a number of parameters including, but not limited to, the firmprice at which the initiating user will buy or sell the selectedcorporate bond, the minimum size that needs to be filled for theinitiating user to agree to buy or sell the selected corporate bond, andthe criteria for allowing invitees to see invitee's submissions at orthe stack GUI itself (i.e., locked, unlocked, open). In someembodiments, when the electronic communication dealer and the respectiveinitiating user electronically agree on a number of parameters includingbut not limited to, transaction fee paid to the electronic communicationdealer, the maximum number of invitees that the electronic communicationdealer can invite, and the length of time of the electroniccommunication session. In some embodiments, the exemplary inventiveelectronic execution-mediating platform of the present disclosure isconfigured to allow the electronic communication dealer to select anoption to either i) fill the full quantity of corporate bonds at apre-determined price or ii) provide a backstop. In some embodiments, a“Buy Now” option may be employed that allows invited participants,provided they accept the full transaction amount, to immediately agreeto the transaction.

For example, if the electronic communication dealer does not agree tofill the full quantity of the initiating user's electronic communicationsession, the electronic communication dealer will invite its selectedinvitees to participate in the electronic communication. In someembodiments, the electronic communication dealer's list of invitees maybe informed by invitees' rankings generated by the exemplary inventiveelectronic execution-mediating platform of the present disclosure basedon the information in the liquidity cloud (e.g., in an associateddatabase) and/or the electronic communication dealer's own data. Forexample, additionally, unless the initiating user has requestedotherwise, the exemplary inventive electronic execution-mediatingplatform of the present disclosure would also provide selected inviteesthat are able to be invitees in the particular electronic communicationsession based at least in part on their pre-trade intentions in specificfinancial instruments (e.g., corporate bonds).

In some embodiments, an electronic execution-mediating cloud platformmay be configured to facilitate communication amongst parties withimproved control over access to information and permission toparticipate compared to technology known to the field of electroniccommunication and networking. In some applications, it is beneficial tocontrol which participants participate in a communication session andthe types of actions those participants may take and the informationthey can view. Using improved technological mechanisms, the electroniccommunication session can be used to prevent information leakage usingtechnological solutions including a stack software object that controlsthe participation levels of the parties.

In some embodiments, an exemplary inventive electronicexecution-mediating platform of the present disclosure is configuredbased at least in part on an exemplary inventive electroniccommunicating protocol that allows users of the exemplary inventiveelectronic execution-mediating platform to electronically trade variousfinancial instruments such as, without limitation, corporate bonds. Insome embodiments, the exemplary inventive electronic execution-mediatingplatform of the present disclosure is configured based at least in parton the exemplary inventive electronic communicating protocol that allowsusers to utilize one or more inventive specifically-programmed graphicaluser interfaces (specialized GUIs) to engage in an innovativeelectronic-based competitive bidding of the present disclosure (theinventive electronic request for execution process (electroniccommunication process)) for one or more particular trading offersinvolving one or more financial instruments such as corporate bonds. Insome embodiments, the exemplary inventive electronic execution-mediatingplatform of the present disclosure is configured based at least in parton the exemplary inventive electronic communicating protocol that modelsthe trading workflow to be operated through messages that follow theFinancial Information Exchange Protocol (FIX) standard.

In some embodiments, the FIX standard includes an electroniccommunications protocol for international real-time exchange ofinformation related to securities transactions and markets. FIX includesstandards for message encodings and session protocols that may beadapted for use with the electronic communication session of theexemplary inventive electronic execution-mediating platform of thepresent disclosure.

In some embodiments, the FIX standard includes use of the FIX Adaptedfor Streaming (FAST) protocol. The FAST protocol facilitates one tocompress data organized in accordance with FIX protocol (“the FIX data”)to minimize the size of the transported FIX data.

FIGS. 1A and 1B show illustrative flow charts of an exemplary workflowassociated with a lifecycle of an exemplary electronic communicationsession having the technological improvement including the stacksoftware object.

In some embodiments, a user may initiate an electronic communication orexchange session on the electronic execution-mediating cloud platform toinitiate communication amongst parties. However, the initiating user maybe initiation of the communication session to exchange sensitiveinformation and data. Thus, the electronic execution-mediating cloudplatform may employ the stack software object to ensure that access tothis sensitive information is restricted to a minimum number of parties,each having a restricted ability to participate in the communicationsession according to participation levels instituted by the stacksoftware object.

In some embodiments, the user may initiate the electronic communicationsession by selecting an intermediate entity from a pool of potentialintermediate entities. The intermediate entity is selected to mediatethe electronic communication session. For example, in some embodiments,an initiating user (e.g., a buy-side initiating user) may be presentedwith a list of the intermediate entities with whom the initiating userhas the necessary agreements for participation in the electroniccommunication session. Thus, in some embodiments, the electronicexecution-mediating cloud platform may utilize an initiating useraccount and the intermediate entity account of each intermediate entityin the pool to identify matching intermediate entities. Thus, theelectronic execution-mediating cloud platform ensures that theintermediate entity ultimately selected by the initiating user has legalor other responsibilities to the initiating user, thus preventingleakage of information regarding the initiated electronic communicationsession to unaffiliated intermediate entities in the pool of potentialintermediate entities.

For example, the electronic execution-mediating cloud platform may onlysurface intermediate entities from the pool of potential intermediateentities that have matching agreement attributes to the initiating user,such as flags or data entries representing a legal agreement to engagewith each other in, e.g., financial asset trading. For example, theelectronic execution-mediating cloud platform may only surfaceintermediate entities that have legal agreements as dealers to theinitiating user to allow trading through the electronicexecution-mediating platform and network.

In some embodiments, the exemplary inventive electronicexecution-mediating platform of the present disclosure may beconfigured, via the one or more exemplary specialized GUIs of thepresent disclosure, to allow the initiating user to electronicallyselect a desired intermediate entity (e.g., the single dealer). In someembodiments, the exemplary inventive electronic execution-mediatingplatform of the present disclosure may be configured to dynamicallyselect for the initiating user the intermediate entity (e.g., the singledealer) to be used. In some embodiments, the exemplary inventiveelectronic execution-mediating platform of the present disclosure may beconfigured to dynamically suggest, based at least in part on one or morespecialized analytical techniques (e.g., machine learning algorithms)detailed herein, to the initiating user a list of candidate intermediateentities (e.g., dealers) so that the initiating user can choose adesired intermediate entity (e.g., the single dealer) to be used.

The initiating user may select a single intermediate entity tofacilitate the session, which may trigger an electronic message to besent to the selected intermediate entity. The selected intermediateentity may receive a notification through, e.g., an electronicexecution-mediating application (e.g., the request to host an electroniccommunication session may appear as an “alert”, in a dedicated alertwindow, e.g., to minimize the amount of screen space used).

In some embodiments, the electronic execution-mediating application mayinclude, e.g., a software application, including front end design andback end processing, network communication, visualization generation anda graphical user interface for interacting with the electronicexecution-mediating cloud platform. In some embodiments, the electronicexecution-mediating application may include, e.g., an intermediateentity selection component enabling the initiating user to select anintermediate entity from the list of potential intermediate entitiessurfaced by the electronic execution-mediating cloud platform. Moreover,the electronic execution-mediating application may include, e.g., anintermediate entity component that enables a selected intermediateentity to accept, deny and/or negotiate terms of the selection tomediate the electronic communication session. Additionally, theelectronic execution-mediating application may include an activitymonitor that enables the initiating user, the selected intermediateentity, or both to monitor activities occurring within the electroniccommunication session, such as, e.g., submissions, communications,transfers of information and data, etc.

In some embodiments, the electronic message to the selected intermediateentity may send the electronic communication session data, includingelectronic communication session attributes to the selected intermediateentity. In some embodiments, the session attributes may includeparameters of a financial transaction, such as, e.g., committed level,trade now level, electronic communication session length (e.g., intime), spot instructions, among other parameters for a trade negotiationfor the trade of a quantity of a position in a financial instrument,such as, e.g., a bond, a stock, or other financial instrument. In someembodiments, the “trade now level” refers to, e.g., a pre-determinedprice for parties to the electronic communication session to purchaseposition in the financial instrument, or other minimum level of responsein exchange for a transfer of data. Each of the attributes definesaspects of what parties may participate in the electronic communicationsession and the rules concerning participation. The intermediate entitymay have an interest in less strict rules to include more parties forgreater confidence in, e.g., executing a trade or transfer during thesession, while the initiating user may have an interest in more strictrules to prevent information leakage. Thus, the platform enables anegotiation for a balance between potential information leakage andpotential mediation success. Thus, the electronic communication sessionmay be customized in every instance.

In some embodiments, the intermediate entity, via the electronicexecution-mediating application, may counter the session request tonegotiate the attributes. For example, the intermediate entity maycounter, e.g., to buy the subject of the transaction directly from theinitiating user (e.g., buy the financial instrument such as, e.g.,bonds), to negotiate the transaction spread, to negotiate the committedlevel, or other parameters of the transaction.

In some embodiments, the attributes may include, e.g., a backstop bidbetween the selected intermediate entity and the initiating user for aposition in a financial instrument subject to the electroniccommunication session. The backstop bid is an element of the pre-tradeinitiation process between the intermediate entity and the client whoselected him to host the electronic communication session. For example,where the initiation user is a seller that approaches an intermediateentity acting as a dealer to sell a financial instrument at a givenprice, the intermediate entity may commit to buy a lesser quantity ofthe financial instrument (e.g., a quantity of a bond below the quantitythat the seller is seeking to sell) and work an order on the rest“.Thus, the seller gains certainty that at least some of” the seller'sposition in the financial instrument will be sold, while theintermediate entity's trade, e.g., once it prints on TRACE, may helpother investors assess the current value of the bond. Thus, in anelectronic communication session, the backstop is a commitment by theintermediate entity to step in and buy up to the amount specified at thecommitted level, if the full amount fails to trade. The existence orabsence of a backstop bid does not impact the ability of other investorsto bid whatever they choose. It may be implemented as an optional,one-time commitment from the intermediate entity to cover a portion ofthe trade if necessary.

In some embodiments, the exemplary inventive electronicexecution-mediating platform of the present disclosure is configured,via the one or more exemplary specialized GUIs of the presentdisclosure, to allow the initiating user to set one or more attributesfor which a particular participant or invitee to the electroniccommunication session would be able to see bids/offers placed during theexemplary electronic communication session by other invitees orinvitees; thus, increasing transparency associated with electronic tradeexecution, and the likelihood of price improvement for the initiatinguser.

In some embodiments, the initiating user may respond to an intermediateentity counter with updated parameters. For example, the initiating usermay set a new transactions spread as part of the new electroniccommunication session, or a new committed level or electroniccommunication session length, or any other parameter countered by theselected intermediate entity. However, where the counter by the selectedintermediate entity includes an offer to buy the position in a financialinstrument directly, the initiating user may be presented with a tradeconfirm option, selectable by the initiating user to conduct the trade.

In some embodiments, once the attributes are agreed upon by theinitiating user and the selected intermediate entity, the initiatinguser may be provided with an option to instruct the intermediate entityduring the electronic communication session by sending electroniccommunications with a “Note to Trader” option. In some embodiments, theelectronic execution-mediating application may also present theinitiating user with an option to cancel or withdraw from the electroniccommunication session prior to launch of the electronic communicationsession.

In some embodiments, prior to launch of the electronic communicationsession, the electronic execution-mediating application may provide theselected intermediate entity with, e.g., an option to select inviteesfrom a pool of potential invitees and then launch the electroniccommunication session. In some embodiments, to select the invitees, theintermediate entity selects the alert/activity monitor item, the “tradeticket” appears and the customer recommendation list appears in theticket. At this point, the intermediate entity can select/deselectinvitees in the list or set filters based on the customer liquidityscores (likelihood to trade) and/or limit the total number ofinvitations sent out (to address information leakage). In someembodiments, once the selections are made, the intermediate entity“submits” the ticket and similar notifications are sent to the selectedinvitees.

In some embodiments, the selected intermediate entity may be permittedto select invitees from all electronic execution-mediating-enabledcounterparties. However, where the electronic execution-mediatingplatform includes larger quantities of potential invitees, theelectronic execution-mediating application may be configured to allowthe selected intermediate entity to set defaults for, e.g., the minimumliquidity score/maximum number of potential invitees to engage in thetrade. Thus, in some embodiments, the electronic execution-mediatingapplication may utilize invitee characteristics from potential inviteeaccounts. In some embodiments, the invitee account characteristics mayinclude, e.g., the invitee's name, the invitees committed level, atransfer history associated with the invitee's account, among others.

In some embodiments, the liquidity score and invitee limit fields existon the session request. Where the intermediate entity may set defaultson these limit fields, the intermediate entity may dynamically set andmodify the limit fields to dynamically filter potential invitees. Insome embodiments, in addition to the machine learning inviteesuggestions described above, the liquidity cloud analytics module mayalso track “concurrent activity” for each potential invitee, where theconcurrent activity indicates that a potential invitee is unavailable toparticipate in the electronic communication session. In someembodiments, the capacity to trade based on availability may vary basedon invitee characteristics, such as, e.g., the size of a firm. This isbecause larger firms may automate much of the electronic communicationsession trade process, allowing the large firms to handle a highervolume of requests. Smaller firms, on the other hand, may manuallyparticipate via the stack GUI and thus likely have more limited capacityto participate in concurrent electronic communication sessions.

Moreover, the intermediate entity may be provided with a list ofsuggested invitees of the potential invitees, e.g., based on the accountcharacteristics associated with each potential invitee. For example, theliquidity cloud analytics module described below may predict alikelihood of each potential invitee to accept the parameters agreedupon by the initiating user and the selected intermediate entity, and toplace a winning bid for the transaction. In some embodiments, the listincludes the potential invitees that meet a liquidity threshold. In someembodiments, the liquidity threshold may include, e.g., a percentilethreshold (e.g., the invitee must be a member of certain percentile oflikelihood, such as, top 75 percentile, of the predicted likelihood ofpotential invitees to participate and/or win the transaction of theelectronic communication session), a number of invitees threshold (e.g.,a highest number of potential invitees according to predictedlikelihood, such as the top 10 or 20 invitees), or a likelihoodthreshold include a minimum predicted likelihood score.

In some embodiments, the initiating user may monitor the electroniccommunication session via the activity monitor and take steps to improvechances of execution. For example, the initiating user may, e.g., addmore invitees, edit committed level (for unlocked/open stacks), extendelectronic communication session length, or modify other attributes toimprove the likelihood of the execution of a trade. In some embodiments,the activity monitor may provide a live or real-time update to theactivity monitor for the initiating user to monitor the state of theelectronic communication session. For example, the initiating user maymonitor the bids and choose to trade early or receive trade confirmationif electronic communication exchanges are executed according to theattributes.

In some embodiments, the set of session invitees selected by theintermediate entity may be presented with the activity monitoryaccording to the attributes of the electronic communication sessionagreed upon by the initiating user and the intermediate entity. In someembodiments, the attributes may define settings of the stack softwareobject that establish participation levels of selected invitees. In someembodiments, the participation levels affect the user computing devicesand the electronic execution-mediating cloud platform to restrict typesof activities that the parties to the electronic communication sessionmay engage in and view, e.g., via a stack graphical user interface(GUI). In some embodiments, the permissions of each session invitee toaccess communications during the electronic communication session, suchas, e.g., an open, locked or unlocked permissions level of the stackGUI, as described above.

In some embodiments, the exemplary inventive electronicexecution-mediating platform of the present disclosure is configured toallow each initiating user to set one or more attributes to establishthe settings of the stack software object that controls the scope ofwhat invitees could see at the stack GUI during an electroniccommunication session. For example, once the electronic communicationdealer has invited a select number of invitees, the electroniccommunication dealer's invitees and, optionally, the liquiditydatabase's invitees are able to place bids or offers, depending on thedirection of the particular electronic communication session, for theselected corporate bond. For example, in some embodiments, invitees tothe electronic communication session are able to see certain informationat the stack GUI based, at least in part, on whether the stack softwareobject setting for the electronic communication session is “locked”,“unlocked,” or “open”. For example, in some embodiments, the initiatinguser and the electronic communication dealer can also see some or allinformation being posted to the stack GUI. For example, in someembodiments, all invitees are able to bid/offer or improve the level oftheir bid/offer for the selected corporate bond for the duration of theelectronic communication session. For example, in some embodiments,responding with price levels is a competitive process for the durationof the electronic communication session and will be determined by price,then size, then time, unless the electronic communication session isfully allocated, at which point the submissions shown by the stack GUIwill be ordered by price, then time.

In some embodiments, when the stack GUI is locked the stack GUI orinvitees' submissions during the electronic communication session arevisible only to those invitees that have placed a bid having certainpredetermined parameter(s) (e.g., submissions at the committed level orbetter).

In some embodiments, when the stack GUI is unlocked the stack GUI orinvitees' submissions during the electronic communication session areonly visible to those invitees that have placed a bid (e.g., submissionsat any level). For “unlocked” stacks, the initiating user specifiespredetermined parameters including, e.g., an indicative price (notfirm). As with locked stacks, invitees need to submit levels at orbetter than the reserve level to gain access to the stack. Thedifference is that the initiating user has an option, not a firmcommitment, to trade at the reserve level.

In some embodiments, when the stack GUI is Open: the stack GUI orinvitees' submissions during the electronic communication session arevisible to all invitees.

In some embodiments, the stack type options help an initiatinguser/trader manage the trade-off for the amount of information they needto share with counterparties to create a robust bidding environment.

For example, in any given month, less than, e.g., 20% of all UScorporate bonds have at least 1 trade every business day. This episodicnature of trading makes it difficult for investors to calibrate thecurrent price of a specific bond to the dynamic conditions in themarket. In some embodiments, the electronic execution-mediating platformemploys the locked, unlocked and open stack software objectparticipation levels to give trade initiating users tools to help themtailor the trading process across a range of market conditions.

In some embodiments, for liquid bonds from popular issuers, lockedstacks are generally the most appropriate option. The locked stackparticipation level forces invitees to commit some degree of risk inorder to see the prices submitted by those with whom they would becompeting to trade the bond.

In some embodiments, an unlocked stack gives the initiating user theoption to set a secondary level which if met by the bidders allows themto see the bids entered by others. The bidders' levels are treated as“firm” (i.e., must be honored), while the initiating user retains anoption to proceed or walk away from the trade. The unlocked stackparticipation level lets potential counterparties interact in a mannerthat can get a conversation started.

The open stack participation level creates a forum for price discoveryfor “hard to trade” assets.

In some embodiments, session invitees are then able to submit theirtrade parameters (size and level) and view the “stack”, which providestransparency into the activity of all participants. However, based onthe participation levels, the session invitees may or may not be able tosee identifiers (e.g., names) associated with each other session inviteeparticipating in the electronic communication session. For example, alocked stack GUI may anonymize each session invitee in the electroniccommunication session.

In some embodiments, the session invitees may also be presented with theoption to submit one or more bids via the stack GUI. In someembodiments, a matching engine that processes inputs to an order bookanonymizes the names of the participants in the electronic communicationsession. The system also maintains the anonymized name mapped to eachparticipant. As the subscription manager routes updates about the orderbook to the stack GUI, it converts the anonymized name to the “My Bid”for display to the user. In some embodiments, communications to theelectronic communication session may be routed via the FIX standards andconverted in a similar fashion.

For example, in some embodiments, the electronic communication systememploys the “liquidity cloud”, e.g., the computing cloud 1705 of FIG. 17described below. In order to participate in the liquidity cloud, onemust be an intermediate entity on the platform or a client of at leastone intermediate entity. The liquidity cloud allows participants toshare their current interest with the electronic execution-mediatingplatform so that they have an ability to participate in trades, shouldthe opportunity present itself. Information leakage leads to areluctance among market participants to advertise their intentions.Thus, the liquidity cloud collects these intentions by electroniccommunication session system, with the understanding that should the“other side of the trade” emerge, the electronic communication sessionsystem has the ability to reach liquidity throughout its entire network.

In some embodiments, the stack software object controlling theelectronic communication session system implements the rules thatcontrol access to content for all participants based upon their role inthe trade. The initiating user only selects the intermediate entity. Wehave plans to allow initiating users to communicate white list/blacklist rosters of other account managers that the initiating user wants toallow/block from invitation to the electronic communication session.This would be allowed as a further means for controlling informationleakage. It may be obvious to market participants that if a given bondis being sold in a large size that, it is likely that, e.g., a top 10asset manager is the seller, which may spook the market.

In some embodiments, the attributes may only allow multiple bids, whichmay be scaled or independent, and bids, once placed, to only be allowedto improve on past bids. In some embodiments, the stack software objectcontrolling the electronic communication session may enable a bidder tospecify a minimum bid fill amount. In some embodiment, the electronicexecution-mediating application may only allow for bids that can becanceled by an intermediate entity. Moreover, if the bid is allocated,the bidder may be presented with a trade confirm at the end of theelectronic communication session. However, if a bidder is outbid, thebidder may be presented with an alert. Furthermore, in some embodiments,a reset period may be established where a new bid that impacts existingallocations may trigger the reset period to facilitate resetting theallocations.

In some embodiments, the stack software object may enable the inviteesto have the option to remain anonymous until the electroniccommunication session is completed and ready for booking (if the inviteebids but is not part of the final trade allocation, the intermediateentity will not know they were bidding). In some embodiments, if noagreement exists between a winning bidder from the liquidity cloud andthe host intermediate entity, a “step-in intermediate entity” isassigned to settle the trade. Again, the invitee is in a position toparticipate at all because the invitee has a connection to at least oneintermediate entity.

In some embodiments, the one or more exemplary specialized GUIs of thepresent disclosure may be configured to allow users to engage in theexemplary inventive electronic communication process by allowing aseller or buyer of corporate bonds to send an electronic request thatwould request, via a computer system, an intermediate party (e.g., adealer) to host one or more competitive electronic executions via theelectronic communication session (one or more particular electroniccommunication for one or more particular financial instrument such ascorporate bond). For example, the exemplary inventive electronicexecution-mediating platform of the present disclosure is configured toallow a single intermediate entity (e.g., a single dealer) to executethe exemplary electronic communication bidding on behalf of a seller ora buyer by electronically offering, via specialized electroniccommunication messaging, to a plurality of potential invitees anopportunity to fulfil the initiating user's submission based on one ormore suitable matching condition(s) whose illustrative examples areprovided herein.

In some embodiments, the exemplary inventive electronicexecution-mediating platform of the present disclosure is configured torank potential counterparties by their anticipated level of interest ina transaction. This empowers those sending out these communications tolimit “information leakage”, thereby preventing providing an adversarywith information that can be used against a party (e.g., the initiatinguser or the invitees).

In some embodiments, the exemplary inventive electronicexecution-mediating platform of the present disclosure is configured toallow the intermediate entity to electronically select invitees to whomelectronic invitation may be electronically transmitted. In someembodiments, the exemplary inventive electronic execution-mediatingplatform of the present disclosure is configured to suggest, based atleast in part on one or more specialized analytical techniques (e.g.,machine learning algorithms) detailed herein, to the intermediate entity(e.g., the single dealer) a list of clients of such intermediate entity(i.e., potential invitees) who would be most likely to be interested inselling/buying one or more specific financial instruments (e.g.,specific corporate bond(s)) that would be part of the exemplary sell orbuy offer; consequently, allowing to electronically aggregate (andpotentially increase) liquidity across multiple invitees.

In some embodiments, the exemplary inventive electronicexecution-mediating platform of the present disclosure is configured torequire, via the one or more exemplary specialized GUIs of the presentdisclosure, an initiating user to submit a firm buy/sell order having aminimum price that, if met, the initiating user will commit to buy orsell the specified financial instrument (e.g., corporate bond),depending on the direction of the exemplary inventive electroniccommunication. In some embodiments, the exemplary inventive electronicexecution-mediating platform of the present disclosure is configured torequire, via the one or more exemplary specialized GUIs of the presentdisclosure, not only a certain price but also certain size/quantity(e.g., a minimum size/quantity). In some embodiments, the exemplaryinventive electronic execution-mediating platform of the presentdisclosure may be configured to vary value(s) for the required price,the required quantity, or both, based at least in part on one or more ofa type of financial instrument, issuer of financial instrument (e.g.,corporate bond), characteristic(s) of initiating user (e.g., historicaltransactional data), characteristic(s) of the selected intermediateentity (e.g., the single dealer), etc.

The matching engine that processes inputs to the order book anonymizesthe names of the participants in the trade. The system also maintainsthe anonymized name mapped to each participant. As the subscriptionmanager routes updates about the order book to the UI, it converts theanonymized name to the “My Bid” for display to the user. In someembodiments, a similar conversion is made for messages routed via FIX.In some embodiments, the dealer sees explicit names for all participantsbecause each is a client of the dealer. However, the participants areprevented from viewing the names of other participants to preventinformation leakage. In some embodiments, the anonymized names arerandomly chosen for each transaction. As a result, a buyer might be“bidder 1” on one trade and “bidder 89” on the next one.

In some embodiments, the exemplary inventive electronicexecution-mediating platform of the present disclosure is configured toutilize one or more suitable specialized analytical techniques (e.g.,machine learning algorithms), as detailed herein, to identify mostlikely invitees to participate in the electronic communication session.For example, electronic execution-mediating platform may employ acloud-based analytics module that identifies the most likely invitees ofthe pool of potential invites to transact with a particular financialinstrument (e.g., corporate bond) based at least in part on continuouslyupdatable database(s) (liquidity database(s)) which electronicallyaggregate(s), for example, without limitation, one or more oftransactional data various market participants, their pre-tradeintentions, and characteristic(s) of their desired counterparty(ies). Insome embodiments, the exemplary inventive electronic execution-mediatingplatform of the present disclosure is configured to operate as amembership network of users who may be invited to participate in aparticular electronic communication session based on their pre-tradeintention and/or estimated trade likelihood even when they are notassociated with the particular intermediate entity (e.g., the singledealer); thus providing additional source of liquidity for the inventiveelectronic execution of the present disclosure. In some embodiments, theexemplary inventive electronic execution-mediating platform of thepresent disclosure is configured to utilize one or more suitablespecialized analytical techniques (e.g., machine learning algorithms),as detailed herein, to determine a liquidity score for a particularfinancial instrument (e.g., corporate bond) (a quantitativerepresentation of a likelihood to find a successful matching) based atleast in part on, without limitation, users' pre-trade intentions and/ortheir estimated trade likelihood.

In some embodiments, the exemplary liquidity cloud's analytics modulemay be configured to generate/utilize separate prediction models foreach intermediate entity and/or financial instrument (e.g., corporatebond) based on one or more machine learning techniques (such as, but notlimited to, decision trees, boosting, support-vector machines, neuralnetworks, nearest neighbor algorithms, Naive Bayes, bagging, randomforests, etc.). In some embodiments and, optionally, in combination ofany embodiment described above or below, an exemplary neural networktechnique may be one of, without limitation, feedforward neural network,radial basis function network, recurrent neural network, convolutionalnetwork (e.g., U-net) or other suitable networks. In some embodimentsand, optionally, in combination of any embodiment described above orbelow, an exemplary implementation of Neural Network may be executed asfollows:

-   1) define Neural Network architecture/model,-   2) transfer the input data to the exemplary neural network model,-   3) train the exemplary model incrementally,-   4) determine the accuracy for a specific number of timesteps,-   5) apply the exemplary trained model to process the newly-received    input data,-   6) optionally and in parallel, continue to train the exemplary    trained model with a predetermined periodicity.

In some embodiments and, optionally, in combination of any embodimentdescribed above or below, the exemplary trained neural network model mayspecify a neural network by at least a neural network topology, a seriesof activation functions, and connection weights. For example, thetopology of a neural network may include a configuration of nodes of theneural network and connections between such nodes. In some embodimentsand, optionally, in combination of any embodiment described above orbelow, the exemplary trained neural network model may also be specifiedto include other parameters, including but not limited to, biasvalues/functions and/or aggregation functions. For example, anactivation function of a node may be a step function, sine function,continuous or piecewise linear function, sigmoid function, hyperbolictangent function, or other type of mathematical function that representsa threshold at which the node is activated. In some embodiments and,optionally, in combination of any embodiment described above or below,the exemplary aggregation function may be a mathematical function thatcombines (e.g., sum, product, etc.) input signals to the node. In someembodiments and, optionally, in combination of any embodiment describedabove or below, an output of the exemplary aggregation function may beused as input to the exemplary activation function. In some embodimentsand, optionally, in combination of any embodiment described above orbelow, the bias may be a constant value or function that may be used bythe aggregation function and/or the activation function to make the nodelikely to be activated.

In some embodiments and, optionally, in combination of any embodimentdescribed above or below, an exemplary connection data for eachconnection in the exemplary neural network may include at least one of anode pair or a connection weight. For example, if the exemplary neuralnetwork includes a connection from node N1 to node N2, then theexemplary connection data for that connection may include the node pair<N1, N2>. In some embodiments and, optionally, in combination of anyembodiment described above or below, the connection weight may be anumerical quantity that influences if and/or how the output of N1 ismodified before being input at N2. In the example of a recurrentnetwork, a node may have a connection to itself (e.g., the connectiondata may include the node pair <N1, N1>).

In some embodiments and, optionally, in combination of any embodimentdescribed above or below, the exemplary trained neural network model mayalso include a species identifier (ID) and fitness data. For example,each species ID may indicate which of a plurality of species (e.g.,intermediate entities', initiating users', invitees' and/or corporatebonds' categories) a particular model is classified in. For example, thefitness data may indicate how well the exemplary trained neural networkmodel models the input data set. For example, the fitness data mayinclude a fitness value that is determined based on evaluating thefitness function with respect to the model. For example, the exemplaryfitness function may be an objective function that is based on afrequency and/or magnitude of errors produced by testing the exemplarytrained neural network model on the input data set. As a simple example,assume the input data set includes ten rows, that the input data setincludes two columns denoted A and B, and that the exemplary trainedneural network model outputs a predicted value of B given an input valueof A. In this example, testing the exemplary trained neural networkmodel may include inputting each of the ten values of A from the inputdata set, comparing the predicted values of B to the correspondingactual values of B from the input data set, and determining if and/or byhow much the two predicted and actual values of B differ. To illustrate,if a particular neural network correctly predicted the value of B fornine of the ten rows, then the exemplary fitness function may assign thecorresponding model a fitness value of 9/10=0.9. It is to be understoodthat the previous example is for illustration only and is not to beconsidered limiting. In some embodiments, the exemplary fitness functionmay be based on factors unrelated to error frequency or error rate, suchas number of input nodes, node layers, hidden layers, connections,computational complexity, etc.

For example, a particular predictive model can be created by followingat least the 3-step process of:

-   1) Data Extraction,-   2) Data Enrichment, and-   3) Modelling.

Data Extraction

In some embodiments, the data used in the model comes from a combinationof information from private (non-public data of a particular user (e.g.,intermediate entity)) and public electronic sources, and may include oneor more chosen from:

-   1) Transaction Data (e.g., the post-trade settlement process data),    having at least one or more of the following parameters:    -   a) Trade Time (dd/mm/yyyy hh:mm:ss)    -   b) CUSIP    -   c) Customer Account #    -   d) Trade Amount    -   e) Trade Price    -   f) Direction (buy/sell)-   2) Security/financial instrument (e.g., corporate bond) Master Data    (e.g., structural and descriptive attributes are collected for each    bond; for example, some of these attributes are used as direct model    inputs; and others are used to generate expected performance and    risk metrics that help the model calibrate the interactions between    clients and tradable bonds), having at least one or more of the    following parameters/fields:-   a) Maturity Date,-   b) Coupon Type,-   c) Coupon Rate,-   d) Coupon Payment Frequency,-   e) Day-count type,-   f) Call Schedule (if applicable),-   g) Put Schedule (if applicable),-   h) Floating Rate Coupon Formula (if applicable),-   i) Principal Redemption Schedule (if applicable),-   j) Issuer Name,-   k) Industry/Sector (multiple levels),-   1) Amount Outstanding,-   m) Original Issue Amount,-   n) Investment Grade/High Yield Flag,-   o) Credit Ratings,-   p) Spread data (e.g., to assess the market's view on the credit risk    of an asset versus credit ratings),-   q) TRACE-eligibility flag,    -   i) Supplied by FINRA to identify bonds whose transactions must        be reported to the regulator.-   3) Price Data (e.g., a minimum of 3 months history may be required    to build/train each dealer's model; for example, the price history    repository covers all TRACE-eligible bonds and the benchmark US    Treasury notes/bonds that are a reference point for market    participants), having at least one or more of the following    parameters:-   a) Daily closing prices are collected for each bond,-   b) Intraday US Treasury prices are collected for each of the    following benchmark maturities:    -   i) 2-year, 3-yr, 5-yr, 7-yr, 10-yr, 30-yr,-   c) A LIBOR model is used to derive the benchmark levels for bonds    with less than 13 months to maturity,-   d) Trade-by-trade data from FINRA TRACE.

In some embodiments, the exemplary inventive analytics module mayutilize trader/salesperson identifier(s) in the trading data to segmentlarger asset managers into several distinct recommendation targets,based upon their sales coverage. For example, salesperson A may coverasset manager B for investment grade bonds but salesperson B may havethe relationship for high yield.

In some embodiments, the exemplary inventive analytics module mayutilize the account number to identify “block accounts”, which are usedfor the initial booking of a trade and “real accounts” that hold assetsfor investors. Then, the exemplary inventive analytics module mayidentify groups of “real accounts” that share similar asset selectionand trading tendencies, allowing to break down larger clients into moregranular segments. For example, groups of real accounts can beidentified based on, e.g., “passive investors” that seek to match theperformance of an index, and “active investors” look to beat the index.The bonds passive investors and active investors trade and the timing ofthese trades have distinctive patterns according to the type ofinvestor.

Data Enrichment

In some embodiments, the Data Enrichment step may involve a process ofTrade Aggregation, performed by the liquidity cloud's analytics module.In some embodiments, the Trade Aggregation process is a component of ourhistorical Data Enrichment, where, e.g., analytics module extracts rawdata from settlement systems and matches the trades to market eventsreported in FINRA's TRACE system. The liquidity cloud provides a view ofcurrent market information, contributed by user firms (both buy-side &dealers). For example, since the post-trade data may include both theoriginal block trade and records for the final allocations to thebeneficial owners of the securities, the exemplary inventive analyticsmodule may generate a prediction model that would focus on decisionmaker(s) in each trade (e.g., the block trade counterparty). Forexample, using a combination of the dealer transaction data and theFINRA TRACE data, the exemplary inventive analytics module may match thetransactions from each dealer's records to the specific transaction inTRACE. For example, in cases where multiple transactions in the dealerrecords match a single TRACE trade, the exemplary inventive analyticsmodule may first look for a record that exactly matches the trade sizereported to FINRA. If such a trade is found, the exemplary inventiveanalytics module may associate the counterparty in that record as theexecuting counterparty. Furthermore, for example, the exemplaryinventive analytics module may create a parent/child relationshipbetween the executing counterparty and the other accounts that wereassociated with the trade.

In some embodiments, trade aggregation in the data enrichment step mayinclude, e.g., three data aggregation/normalization steps. In someembodiments, a first step includes block trade aggregation from thetransaction history files. The analytics module may create predictionsthat look to identify the entity that acted in the market to execute atrade. Institutional money managers may often trade on behalf of theirclients or, in the case of mutual funds, the legal entity responsiblefor the fund. Moreover, a single trade in the market is often allocatedto multiple accounts at the direction of the asset manager. As a result,the raw transaction records list the beneficial owner (buyer/seller) ofthe traded asset and may also contain a record reflecting the blocktrade recorded prior to the allocations. In some embodiments, theanalytics module employs the main characteristics of the tradesextracted from the dealer records and reconcile these trades totransactions reported in FINRA's TRACE feed. Matching is based uponexact matches on CUSIP, execution time, trade direction, price andcounterparty type. In some embodiments, the analytics module may alsolook to match on total trade size, although this is not always possibledue to FINRA's policy to cap the actual transaction amount reported fortrades larger than $5 MM for investment grade bonds and $1 MM for highyield bonds.

At times, an asset manager executes a trade with a dealer on behalf of asingle client. When this occurs, the asset manager's name may not appearin the trade record captured from the dealer. Instead, the recordcontains just the name of the beneficial owner. Accordingly, in someembodiments, a second step of trade aggregation may include mapping allthe beneficial owner accounts to the corresponding asset manager (acandidate for inclusion in our recommendation model, by virtue of theirtrade decision making authority). This process employs, e.g., aniterative analysis of the counterparties reported by the dealer wherethe rate of co-occurrence among the counterparties identified intransactions with multiple reported participants is measured. In someembodiments, the block account (i.e., the decision-making counterparty)is the most frequently observed trade counterparty.

Finally, the trade aggregation employs a number of natural languageprocessing (NLP) techniques to cleanse the dealer counterparty data. Insome embodiments, the raw information comes from content sets that havegrown organically, sometimes over decades. Account names are created byadministrators at each client and there appear to be no validation rulesto enforce standardization. (This is name/address data, that are notcritical to the trade processing performed by Broadridge). In someembodiments, the analytics module may employ an official source for TaxID's as the target name for each entity in our process and use NLPpattern matching to associate the text strings found in our sources tothe appropriate firm. As more dealers and buy-side clients are onboardedto the platform, the analytics module is able to capture thisinformation directly from the dealers. In some embodiments, this mappingto Tax IDs allows identification of asset managers across the fullspectrum of dealers on the platform.

In some embodiments, the first and second trade aggregation steps may beexecuted daily as new trade records are added in, e.g., a nightly modeltraining process. Thus, the client mappings may be refined as new namesand relationships are uncovered. However, other periods may be employed,such as, e.g., weekly or monthly updates, or in some embodiments, acontinuous update or live update process may be used.

In some embodiments, during the Data Enrichment step, for each record inthe dealer transaction table, the TRACE transaction table and theend-of-day price history table, the exemplary inventive analytics modulemay compute the following values:

-   1) Yield-to-worst (YTW) (e.g., Yield to the issuer's next logical    redemption date),-   2) Option-adjusted Spread (OAS),-   3) Option-adjusted Duration,-   4) Option-adjusted Convexity,-   5) Spread to Benchmark Treasury.

In some embodiments, during the Data Enrichment step, the exemplaryinventive analytics module may apply time series analysis to determineBaseline Liquidity Metric (liquidity score) based at least in part uponthe relative trade volume and trade count for each bond over the mostrecent 3-months of trading. In some embodiments, the Baseline LiquidityMetric is generated based on factors such as, e.g., the activity of thebond observable through TRACE. In some embodiments, for dealers, this isadjusted to account for his recent activity, as a percentage of TRACEactivity overall and in the specific bond being analysed, and forclients, the adjustment is derived from the output of the neuralnetwork, which projects the client's expected level of interest in aparticular trade opportunity. In some embodiments, Baseline LiquidityMetrics are a function of the desired trade price and the size of thetrade. The user has no way to influence how this 3-dimensional surfaceis constructed, other than by executing trades. In some embodiments,however, a user may modify the price and/or size of a trade, and theanalytics module may return the score for the corresponding point onthis surface.

In some embodiments, during the Data Enrichment step, the exemplaryinventive analytics module may utilize Price/Yield volatility, by usingthe end-of-day prices for each bond, to compute, for example, withoutlimitation, 1-mo, 3-mo & 6-mo historical volatility for both the priceand yield. For example, in some embodiments, such metrics may provideinsight into the relative performance risk for bonds with similarstructural characteristics. In some embodiments, during the DataEnrichment step, the exemplary inventive analytics module may utilizeTotal Return metrics, using end-of-day prices for each bond, compute1-mo, 3-mo & 6-mo realized returns for a unit investment. For example,these metrics present the models with critical performance attributesfor the assessing users' trading preferences.

Modelling

In some embodiments, during the Modelling step, the exemplary inventiveanalytics module may employ an ensemble modelling approach. For example,in some embodiments, the exemplary inventive analytics module may employa Natural Language Processing to clean and normalize the set of eligibletrading counterparties. For example, in some embodiments, the exemplaryinventive analytics module may employ K-means clustering to createcandidate groupings of “comparable bonds”. For example, in someembodiments, the exemplary inventive analytics module may utilizeresults of these models as inputs to an exemplary neural network model(e.g., FIG. 2) that would be trained to create an exemplary predictionmodel.

In some embodiments, cleansing and normalizing the set of eligibletrading counterparties ensures that the characteristics of past tradingbehaviours being quantified reflect the actual participants in themarket to provide value to the predictions in guiding future trades.

In some embodiments, K-means clustering is employed by the analyticsmodule due to greater interpretability. For example, the cluster membersmay be exposed in a GUI visualization, e.g., by depicting theclustering. However, other classification and clustering models may beused, including, e.g., random forest, k-nearest neighbours, portioning,etc.

For example, in some embodiments, the exemplary inventive analyticsmodule may generate a user-related Master table/dataset/database. Forexample, the block-trade accounts identified in the trade aggregationprocess above may be mapped to a normalized account name usinginformation collected from the dealer's customer table. For example, insome embodiments, the exemplary inventive analytics module may use acombination of natural language processing and clustering technique(s)to automate the creation of these mappings.

In some embodiments, for example, large asset managers manage fundsusing a variety of investment strategies. Some funds employ passivestrategies, aiming to match the performance of some market benchmarkindex. Other funds employ active strategies that seek to beat theperformance of these indices. In the end, invitations to participate inan electronic communication are delivered to human traders, who managethe accounts that have passive or active performance goals. Treatingthese large firms as single entities is likely to distort the signals weare able to detect. At one extreme, an active manager's interest inbonds with premium prices may be negated by an equally large passivefund manager who only trades bonds that trade at a discount to par.

From a modelling perspective, the biggest challenge is to create thepartitioning of the accounts into the sub groups. The modelling processis not sensitive to the number of potential counterparties, providedthere is sufficient data to adequately model each group.

For example, in some embodiments, the exemplary inventive analyticsmodule may determine a Bond Similarity. For example, the exemplaryinventive analytics module may employ a K-means clustering model toestablish groupings based mainly on security master attributes. Forexample, each bond's assigned cluster number becomes an input featurefor the exemplary neural network of FIG. 2.

For example, in some embodiments, as shown in FIG. 2, the exemplaryinventive analytics module may input a set of transaction data andsecurity information, for example, collected over a minimum of 3 months,as input to the exemplary neural network. For example, such inputs wouldrepresent known information that resulted in trades with specificcounterparties. For example, in some embodiments, the exemplaryinventive analytics module may utilize the exemplary neural network tofit a series of weights that produce a solution that maximizes thenumber of instances where the input from trade X identifies the actualbuyer in that trade.

For example, in some embodiments, the number of hidden layers depends onthe non-linear complexity of particular relationship(s) to be discoveredby the model. For example, in some embodiments, each hidden layer mayhave no more than ⅔ the number of nodes in the input layer. For example,in some embodiments, the exemplary inventive analytics module mayutilize a “SoftMax” function (e.g., function that takes as input avector of K real numbers, and normalizes it into a probabilitydistribution consisting of K probabilities) as the “activation function”applied at each node to control the transfer of information through thenetwork and to reach the output layer. For example, the model wouldassign the probability that each counterparty would be the buyer for thetrade described by a particular input sample.

For example, in some embodiments, the exemplary inventive analyticsmodule may utilize “Default indicator” as a flag that indicates if abond has failed to meet its interest and or principal paymentobligations and to help refine the categorization of securities for boththe bond similarity and the neural network model generation/validation.

In some embodiments, an exemplary generated predictive model can betested by utilizing market data as input data. For example,counterparties in the output layer may be sorted by their probability ofexecution (e.g., the value of the “SoftMax” activation function). Forexample, a positive outcome is defined as cases where the observed bywas:

-   1) Present in the Top 10 most likely buyers, Or,-   2) one of the Top 10 buyers bought the bond in the trade or a    substantially similar bond in the next 24 hours.

In some embodiments, the “substantially similar” test may be defined asa bond from the same cluster, using the K-means clustering model basedon bond attributes.

In some embodiments, the output layer of the neural network assigns avalue ranging from 0 to 1 to each candidate counterparty (names on adealer's client list) (CACi) that can be interpreted as the probabilitythat the counterparty will execute a trade with the specifiedattributes. The ranking is achieved by ordering the customers by thismetric.

In some embodiments, the metric above may be combined with themarket-level liquidity score derived from TRACE using the followingformula: LSi=Min(LSmarket+10*(CACi/2), 10) and presented to a user. Forexample, for bond X, LSmarket=7 and CACi=0.367. Thus, LSi=Min(7+3.67/2,10)=8.84, which may be rounded to 9.

In some embodiments, the above described formula is calibrated to actualmarket outcomes using the data from the actual electronic communicationprocess, e.g., through nightly, weekly, monthly, or real-time updatingand training.

In some embodiments, facilitate the ability by an initiating user toaccess needed liquidity from more “natural” counterparties that anintermediate entity may select as invitees to a given electroniccommunication session. This, once again, reduces information leakage topotential adversaries in the market. In some embodiments, intermediateentities benefit from being able to provide better service to both theinitiating user, who is triggering the event and to the invitees who areasked to participate in the session. Intermediate entities struggle toprovide adequate coverage to clients in the “long tail” of the customerlist. The recommendations help highlight productive opportunities toengage these clients as invitees to electronic communication sessions.In some embodiments, invitees may benefit similar to the intermediateentities because the invitees are more often contacted for opportunitiesthat matter to them, instead of calls meant to “keep them warm”.

FIG. 3 shows exemplary inputs into the exemplary inventive neuralnetwork of the present disclosure (e.g., FIG. 2).

FIG. 4 shows exemplary testing of exemplary predictive models based ontraining and validation scores to determine when an optimal predictivemodel to be used by the exemplary inventive analytics module may forvarious analytics detailed herein.

FIGS. 5A-5C shows exemplary statistics utilized for training exemplarypredictive models.

FIG. 6 is a screenshot of an exemplary inventive specialized GUI of thepresent disclosure in a form of a dashboard showing a state of theexemplary inventive liquidity cloud at a particular time.

FIG. 7 is a screenshot of an exemplary inventive specialized GUI of thepresent disclosure in a form of a dashboard showing pre-trade intentionsof a particular user (e.g., initiating user) of the exemplary inventiveelectronic execution-mediating platform of the present disclosure in theexemplary inventive liquidity cloud at a particular time.

FIG. 8 is a screenshot of the exemplary inventive specialized GUI ofFIG. 7 with a pop-up inventive specialized GUI showing historical dataregarding a particular liquidity score.

FIG. 9 is a screenshot of an exemplary inventive specialized GUI of thepresent disclosure that a particular initiating user can use to set-upparameters of a desired electronic communication session (e.g., targetdealer(s), buy/sell indicator, corporate bond, amount, price, etc.).

FIG. 10 is a screenshot of an exemplary inventive specialized GUI of thepresent disclosure that a particular dealer can use to track requests tohost electronic communication session(s).

FIG. 11 is a screenshot of an exemplary inventive specialized GUI of thepresent disclosure that a particular invitee can use to makesubmission(s) into a particular electronic communication session.

FIGS. 12-16 are screenshots of various states of exemplary inventivespecialized stack GUIs of the present disclosure that are presented tothe initiating user (Seller), the electronic communication dealer, andan invitee during a particular electronic communication session. AsFIGS. 12-16 illustrate, for example, invitee's ability to performcertain activities and view certain information may be limited based onparameters of the electronic communication session (e.g., Locked, Open,etc.).

FIG. 17 illustrates one embodiment of an exemplary environment in whichsome embodiments of the exemplary inventive electronicexecution-mediating platform of the present disclosure may operate. Insome embodiments, exemplary inventive electronic execution-mediatingplatform of the present disclosure may host a large number of users(e.g., at least 1,000, at least 10,000; at least 100,000; at least1,000,000) and/or is capable of conducting a large number of concurrenttransactions such electronic communication sessions (e.g., at least1,000; at least 10,000; at least 100,000; at least 1,000,000). In someembodiments, the exemplary inventive electronic execution-mediatingplatform of the present disclosure is based on a scalable computer andnetwork architecture that incorporates varies strategies for assessingthe data, caching, searching, and database connection pooling. Anexample of the scalable architecture is an architecture that is capableof operating multiple servers.

Referring to FIG. 17, the exemplary inventive electronicexecution-mediating platform of the present disclosure may include usersutilizing computing devices 1702-1704 that are capable of interacting(e.g., receiving and sending electronic communications) to and fromanother computing devices and computing systems/architectures, such asInternet could 1705, servers 1706 and 1707, each other, and the like. Insome embodiments, the set of such computing devices includes devicesthat connect using a wired communications medium such as personalcomputers, multiprocessor systems, microprocessor-based or programmableconsumer electronics, network PCs, and the like. In some embodiments,the set of such computing devices also includes devices that typicallyconnect using a wireless communications medium such as cell phones,smart phones, pagers, walkie talkies, radio frequency (RF) devices,infrared (IR) devices, CBs, integrated devices combining one or more ofthe preceding devices, or virtually any mobile device, and the like. Inembodiments, each member device within member devices 102-104 mayinclude a browser application that is configured to receive and to sendweb pages, and the like. In embodiments, the browser application may beconfigured to receive and display graphics, text, multimedia, and thelike, employing virtually any web based language, including, but notlimited to Standard Generalized Markup Language (SMGL), such asHyperText Markup Language (HTML), a wireless application protocol (WAP),a Handheld Device Markup Language (HDML), such as Wireless MarkupLanguage (WML), WMLScript, JavaScript, and the like. In embodiments, thedisclosure is programmed in either Java or .Net.

In some embodiments, the computing devices 1702-1704 may be furtherconfigured to receive a message from another computing device employinganother mechanism, including, but not limited to email, Short MessageService (SMS), Multimedia Message Service (MMS), instant messaging (IM),internet relay chat (IRC), mIRC, Jabber, and the like.

In some embodiments, the exemplary network 1705 of the exemplaryinventive electronic execution-mediating platform of the presentdisclosure may be configured to have a cloud computing architecture. Forexample, the exemplary inventive liquidity cloud architecture may havethe exemplary Internet cloud architecture 1705 that may include servers1706-1707, running and/or in electronic communication with one or moredatabases such as database 1708 (e.g., liquidity database).

As used herein, the terms “Internet cloud,” “cloud computing,” “cloudarchitecture,” and similar terms correspond to at least one of thefollowing: (1) a large number of computers connected through a real-timecommunication network (e.g., Internet); (2) providing the ability to runa program or application on many connected computers (e.g., physicalmachines, virtual machines (VMs)) at the same time; (3) network-basedservices, which appear to be provided by real server hardware, and arein fact served up by virtual hardware (e.g., virtual servers), simulatedby software running on one or more real machines (e.g., allowing to bemoved around and scaled up (or down) on the fly without affecting theend user). FIGS. 18 and 19 illustrate schematics of exemplaryimplementations of the cloud computing/architectures that the exemplaryinventive electronic execution-mediating platform of the presentdisclosure may be configured as in accordance with at least someembodiments of the present disclosure. For example, the exemplaryinventive electronic execution-mediating platform of the presentdisclosure may be configured as, but not limiting to: infrastructure aservice (IaaS), platform as a service (PaaS), and software as a service(SaaS).

To facilitate understanding, identical reference numerals have beenused, where possible, to designate identical elements that are common tothe figures. The figures are not drawn to scale and may be simplifiedfor clarity. It is contemplated that elements and features of oneembodiment may be beneficially incorporated in other embodiments withoutfurther recitation.

Among those benefits and improvements that have been disclosed, otherobjects and advantages of this present disclosure can become apparentfrom the following description taken in conjunction with theaccompanying figures. Detailed embodiments of the present disclosure aredisclosed herein; however, it is to be understood that the disclosedembodiments are merely illustrative of the present disclosure that maybe embodied in various forms. In addition, each of the examples given inconnection with the various embodiments of the present disclosure isintended to be illustrative, and not restrictive.

Throughout the specification, the following terms take the meaningsexplicitly associated herein, unless the context clearly dictatesotherwise. The phrases “in one embodiment” and “in some embodiments” asused herein do not necessarily refer to the same embodiment(s), thoughit may. Furthermore, the phrases “in another embodiment” and “in someother embodiments” as used herein do not necessarily refer to adifferent embodiment, although it may. Thus, as described below, variousembodiments of the present disclosure may be readily combined, withoutdeparting from the scope or spirit of the present disclosure. Further,when a particular feature, structure, or characteristic is described inconnection with an implementation, it is submitted that it is within theknowledge of one skilled in the art to affect such feature, structure,or characteristic in connection with other implementations whether ornot explicitly described herein.

The term “based on” is not exclusive and allows for being based onadditional factors not described, unless the context clearly dictatesotherwise. In addition, throughout the specification, the meaning of“a,” “an,” and “the” include plural references. The meaning of “in”includes “in” and “on.”

At least some aspects of the present disclosure will now be describedwith reference to the following numbered clauses.

While a number of embodiments of the present disclosure have beendescribed, it is understood that these embodiments are illustrativeonly, and not restrictive, and that many modifications may becomeapparent to those of ordinary skill in the art, including that theinventive methodologies, the inventive systems, and the inventivedevices described herein can be utilized in any combination with eachother. Further still, the various steps may be carried out in anydesired order (and any desired steps may be added, and/or any desiredsteps may be eliminated).

What is claimed is:
 1. A method comprising: receiving, by at least oneprocessor, a session request from an initiating user; wherein thesession request comprises an electronic communication session over acloud computing network for a transfer of a quantity of a position in atleast one financial instrument from the initiating user to at least onesession invitee; generating, by the at least one processor, a list ofpotential intermediate entities based at least in part on a respectivedealer liquidity score associated with each potential intermediateentity of the potential intermediate entities; receiving, by the atleast one processor, a selection from the initiating user identifying aselected intermediate entity of the potential intermediate entities tomediate the electronic communication session; enabling, by the at leastone processor, the initiating user and the selected intermediate entityto negotiate attributes of the electronic communication session;generating, by the at least one processor, based on the attributes ofthe electronic communication session, a stack software objectcontrolling a plurality of participation levels in the electroniccommunication session for each selected invitee of a set of selectedinvitees; wherein the plurality of participation levels comprises: i) alocked stack participation level, ii) an unlocked stack participationlevel, and iii) an open stack participation level; receiving, by the atleast one processor, an invitee selection from the selected intermediateentity indicating the set of selected invitees selected from a pluralityof potential invitees; establishing, by the at least one processor, theelectronic communication session, associated with an intermediarycomputing device of the selected intermediate entity; wherein theelectronic communication session comprises the stack software object;preventing, by the at least one processor, a respective inviteecomputing device associated with each respective selected invitee fromaccessing activities in the electronic communication session unless therespective selected invitee satisfies at least one first predeterminedparameter based on the locked stack participation level of the stacksoftware object; enabling, by the at least one processor, an initiatingcomputing device associated with the initiating user to access in theelectronic communication setting at a reserve level while preventingeach respective invitee computing device associated with each respectiveselected invitee from accessing the activities in the electroniccommunication session unless the respective selected invitee satisfiesat least one second predetermined parameter based on the unlocked stackparticipation level of the stack software object; and enabling, by theat least one processor, the initiating computing device associated withthe initiating user and each respective invitee computing deviceassociated with each respective selected invitee to access theactivities in the electronic communication session based on the openstack participation level of the stack software object.
 2. The method ofclaim 1, wherein the dealer liquidity score comprises a calculated scoreassigned to each potential intermediate entity for the electroniccommunication session based at least in part on historical trading dataof related financial instruments to the at least one financialinstrument.
 3. The method of claim 1, further comprising generating, bythe at least one processor, an alert to a respective user computingassociated with each respective selected invitee of the selectedinvitees to enable each respective selected invitee to join theelectronic communication session according to the plurality ofparticipation levels.
 4. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein adealer selection graphical user interface (GUI) further enable theselected intermediate entity to buy the at least a portion of thequantity of the position in the at least one financial instrument fromthe initiating user prior to the electronic communication session. 5.The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the stack software objectprovides options for each selected invitee of the set of selectedinvitees to submit respective trade parameters comprising a respectivesize and a respective level of a respective portion of the position inthe at least one financial instrument.
 6. The method as recited in claim5, wherein the stack software object prevents each selected invitee ofthe set of selected invitees to submit respective trade parametershaving lesser value than previously submitted trade parameters.
 7. Themethod as recited in claim 1, wherein the stack software object isconfigured to anonymize each selected invitee in the electroniccommunication session.
 8. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein theelectronic communication session remains active until the quantity ofthe position in the at least one financial instrument is fullyallocated.
 9. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein a computingdevice associated with one or more of: the initiating user, the selectedintermediate user and the set of selected invitees, interfaces with theelectronic communication session using an application programminginterface (API).
 10. The method as recited in claim 1, furthercomprising: utilizing, by the at least one processor, a liquidityanalytical model to predict a respective value indicative of arespective expected level of interest for each respective potentialinvitee of a plurality of potential invitees based on characteristics ofthe at least one financial instrument and transaction histories of eachpotential invitee; wherein each respective expected level of interestcomprises a respective probability of each respective potential inviteeto execute a trade of a financial instrument having common attributes tothe at least one financial instrument; and ranking, by the at least oneprocessor, the plurality of potential invitees according to eachrespective value indicative of the respective expected level ofinterest.
 11. A system comprising: at least one processor configured to:receive a session request from an initiating user; wherein the sessionrequest comprises an electronic communication session over a cloudcomputing network for a transfer of a quantity of a position in at leastone financial instrument from the initiating user to at least onesession invitee; generate a list of potential intermediate entitiesbased at least in part on a respective dealer liquidity score associatedwith each potential intermediate entity of the potential intermediateentities; receive a selection from the initiating user identifying aselected intermediate entity of the potential intermediate entities tomediate the electronic communication session; enable the initiating userand the selected intermediate entity to negotiate attributes of theelectronic communication session; generate based on the attributes ofthe electronic communication session, a stack software objectcontrolling a plurality of participation levels in the electroniccommunication session for each selected invitee of a set of selectedinvitees; wherein the plurality of participation levels comprises: i) alocked stack participation level, ii) an unlocked stack participationlevel, and iii) an open stack participation level; receive an inviteeselection from the selected intermediate entity indicating the set ofselected invitees selected from a plurality of potential invitees;establish the electronic communication session, associated with anintermediary computing device of the selected intermediate entity;wherein the electronic communication session comprises the stacksoftware object; prevent a respective invitee computing deviceassociated with each respective selected invitee from accessingactivities in the electronic communication session unless the respectiveselected invitee satisfies at least one first predetermined parameterbased on the locked stack participation level of the stack softwareobject; enable an initiating computing device associated with theinitiating user to access in the electronic communication setting at areserve level while preventing each respective invitee computing deviceassociated with each respective selected invitee from accessing theactivities in the electronic communication session unless the respectiveselected invitee satisfies at least one second predetermined parameterbased on the unlocked stack participation level of the stack softwareobject; and enable the initiating computing device associated with theinitiating user and each respective invitee computing device associatedwith each respective selected invitee to access the activities in theelectronic communication session based on the open stack participationlevel of the stack software object.
 12. The method of claim 11, whereinthe dealer liquidity score comprises a calculated score assigned to eachpotential intermediate entity for the electronic communication sessionbased at least in part on historical trading data of related financialinstruments to the at least one financial instrument.
 13. The system ofclaim 11, wherein the at least one processor is further configured togenerate an alert to a respective user computing device associated witheach respective selected invitee of the selected invitees to enable eachrespective selected invitee to join the electronic communication sessionaccording to the plurality of participation levels.
 14. The system asrecited in claim 11, wherein a dealer selection graphical user interface(GUI) enables the selected intermediate entity to buy the at least aportion of the quantity of the position in the at least one financialinstrument from the initiating user prior to the electroniccommunication session.
 15. The system as recited in claim 11, whereinthe stack software object provides options for each selected invitee ofthe set of selected invitees to submit respective trade parameterscomprising a respective size and a respective level of a respectiveportion of the position in the at least one financial instrument. 16.The system as recited in claim 15, wherein the stack software objectprevents each selected invitee of the set of selected invitees to submitrespective trade parameters having lesser value than previouslysubmitted trade parameters.
 17. The system as recited in claim 11,wherein the stack software object is configured to anonymize eachselected invitee in the electronic communication session.
 18. The systemas recited in claim 11, wherein the electronic communication sessionremains active until the quantity of the position in the at least onefinancial instrument is fully allocated.
 19. The system as recited inclaim 11, further comprising at least one application programminginterface (API) enabling a respective at least one computing deviceassociated with a respective one or more of: the initiating user, theselected intermediate user and the set of selected invitees, interfaceswith the electronic communication session using an applicationprogramming interface (API).
 20. The system as recited in claim 11,wherein the at least one processor is further configured to: utilize aliquidity analytical model to predict a respective value indicative of arespective expected level of interest for each respective potentialinvitee of a plurality of potential invitees based on characteristics ofthe at least one financial instrument and transaction histories of eachpotential invitee; wherein each respective expected level of interestcomprises a respective probability of each respective potential inviteeto execute a trade of a financial instrument having common attributes tothe at least one financial instrument; and rank the plurality ofpotential invitees according to each respective value indicative of therespective expected level of interest.